The analysis of there is three housing type (slums, 4-5 storey housings, residences)surrounding the site is what I grasped from the analysis as a start point. There is no social bond among inhabitants living high-level residences, they do not have the feeling of belonging, sharing, that is what I have criticized. Then, I have decided not to propose a gated building complex but a neighborhood, and aimed to reach that goal by making use of topography, slope, taking references from the city, street, urban grids, roads… This design is a continuation of surrounding low-level urban texture, which is set against the higher level blocks since they destruct the main urban green and the wind corridor of the valley. By intertwining circulation with the urban context, the building shares a public dimension with the city: building and open spaces.
One of my suggestions for the site is to break the standardizing effect of repetition while keeping the already existed pattern, in fact, in a way next to the recurring housing environment criticism.
Rather than abuilding organized and navigated from level to up like residences, I wanted to make the optimum utilization of the site and aimed to redistribute the densities of both the buildings sustainably and the human livings. Rich diversities and varieties of blocks (tall, low, wide, small) create a strong sense of place and respond to many needs. In addition to this, the dynamic skyline will be taking advantage of the valley view. Then I decided to propose a neighborhood.
As a what if question: What if solid and void displace each other in one tower plot. That would create such a courtyard housing typology. Having hard and soft green areas including the courtyards, agriculture area, bazaar place.
The image I choose the Blind Man, which is represented as a blindfolded man is being able to walk with sticks and see with his hands, takes place in Rene Descartes’ essay named La Dioptrique(‘On optics’). Since the blindfolded man sees with his hands, he does not need the help of his sleepy guide dog. This image has been seen firstly in Descartes’book Discours de la Methode in 1637. RenéDescartes (1596–1650) is a philosopher, mathematician and one of the major opticians of the seventeenth century. This essay aims to discuss and give place to the analysis of Descartes’ Blind Man image shown above. Briefly, first, I will be mentioning the subject of sticks being a medium that guides him namely make him see, then how this seeing process works like a natural process of seeing and the system of camera obscura since camera obscura is an optical tool to observe things. Following, the geometry from a perspective of Descartes, cartesian system and the positioning of sticks. Lastly, how blind man seeing with sticks similar to the natural seeing process, and where the brain stands at this discussion.
Descartes has doubts about the process of seeing, and this interrogation has been taken place in his essay La Dioptrique(‘On optics’) at 1637. At one point of his essay, Descartes invokes the hypothetical example of a blind man using a stick to help him navigate, proclaiming ‘one might almost say that they see with their hands’ (Paterson, 2016). Here, ‘seeing with their hands’ is the part that takes anyone’s attention; how is possible a literally blind man able to use sticks and being able to see things? Descartes mentions that the man habitually uses sticks as an extension of his senses. In order to make us understand the subject more easily, he gives examples from daily life: “It sometimes doubtless happened to you, while walking in the night without a light through places which are a little difficult, that it became necessary to use a stick in order to guide yourself;and you have then been able to notice that you felt, through the medium of the stick, the diverse objects around you and that you were even able to tell whether they were trees, or stones, or sand…” (Descartes, 2001) When we look at Descartes’ theory of visual-spatial perception; simple situation perception: “Our awareness of the direction in which our eye or head is turned enables us to determine where the object is located relative to our body, just as a blind man touching an object with a stick can tell what direction it lies in because he knows the direction in which his hand is turned.” Therefore, through the medium of the stick, a blindfolded human being is able to see as well.
Referring to the discussion of a blind man seeing through the medium of the stick, camera obscura can be likened to have a similar process of seeing, it is seen as a tool (optical device) which takes place in that seeing the process. It is like a projection of the outside world. A camera obscura in a fixed position is a tool that enables people to observe things. At this point, asFrench philosopherMerleau-Ponty (1908–1961), observes blind man’s stick has ceased to be an object, a tool for him, and is no longer perceived for itself; its point has become an area of sensitivity, extending the scope and active radius of touch (Ponty). It can be said that how camera obscura is a tool that a human use to observe things, the tool that the blind man uses to see is his sticks.
From another perspective, Descartes is a mathematician as well so it can be found out that he has established crucial relationships with geometry: CartesianCoordinate System which was found by René Descartes. Already, Descartes’s LaDioptrique of the blind man holding two crossed sticks seems to have beenenvisaging the Cartesian geometrization of vision (Tunstall, 2011). In the exploration of things, the Cartesian system is like a verification system which specifies each point in the universe and on x,y,z system. For the blind man case, holding two sticks AE, CE, whose length I suppose him not to know, and knowing [savoir] only the distance between his two hands A and C, and the size of the angles ACE and CAE, can from that, as though by a natural geometry, know [connaître] where E is (Wolf-Devine, 1993). One of the interesting things about the previous passage is Descartes’ “use of the verbs savoir andconnaître. The verb savoir (connoting an intellectual kind of knowledge) is used to describe the blind man’s knowledge of the distance between his hands and the angles made by the sticks, while connaître (meaning ‘to be acquainted with’) is used to describe his knowledge of where the point E is, as though he is trying through this use of the different verbs to arrive at the sort of directness and immediacy associated with the verb connaître, starting from intellectual and perhaps implicitly mathematical knowledge.” Additionally, Descartes refers to natural geometry only in his discussion of the blind man, whereas in the case of vision, he says that the length of the line and the size of the angles ‘make us know’ (connaître) where the point E is. (Wolf-Devine, 1993)
InLa Dioptrique, Descartes draws an analogy between the action of light on the eye and the movement of a blind man’s stick as it probes the surfaces of objects in its path and goes on to discuss the formation of images in the back of the eye (O’Riley, 1998). “A blind man with crossed sticks who is able to feel an object to the right with his left hand and one to the left with his right hand and a person who sees objects in their true situations ‘although the picture which they print in the eye has a wholly contrary situation’”. The blind man is not confused by the crossed sticks because he can direct his attention out from his hands. (Wolf-Devine, 1993) Briefly, when the blind man of whom it has spoken above touches some object with his sticks, the crossed sticks in the blindfolded man’s hands refer to the inversion of the retinal images. Descartes maintains that the man is still able to ‘perceive’objects in their correct relation (O’Riley, 1998).And, this is very much related with the process of seeing physically; in general, terms, so the rays from the object form an inverted image in the eye, then the image in the brain is reversed and the image is reversed, and visualization occurs.
back to geometry; there is axonometric projection is needed to be addressed
related to the subject. Considering the perception of spatial depth, with the
correct use of dimensions, angles, and distances the whole image can be
produced. We do not see the object, but we know it is like this, we know the
qualities of object. And, the understanding of perspective drawing: There is
the illusion related from nature of the eye, our eyes cannot produce the exact
image without brain, so it is like an illusion of eye. What we must do to grasp
the image at this point is thinking and using our minds. Here, there is one
thing that should be mentioned: René Descartes is regarded also as the father
of modern philosophy for defining a starting point for existence, “I think;
therefore I am.” (Editors, 2014) So, it might be said
that blind man sees better than seeing man because he sees through his mind not
eyes. We can see through our minds. It is in the mind, not the eye, that really
Considering the point on the natural process of seeing, the mind needs to perceive certain images transmitted by the objects to the brain. And again, when we look at what Descartes argue on truth, mathematics, and visuality we seethe discussion of the ‘eye of the mind’ and the ‘eye of the body’. Thereis now a solution to this paradox, which is to distinguish between the”eye of the mind” and the “eye of the body” (Descartes1908, Rule V, p. 380). This “eye of the mind” sees more clearly. Going back to Descartes’ verb savoir (connoting an intellectual kind of knowledge), the “intellectual eye” sees all more clearly the more the body’s eyes remain blind.
In conclusion, as shown in the essay, the main point is to analyze the Blind Man image of Descartes by introducing of the ideas behind its creation. Respectively I have tried to mention the sticks the blind man holds, how they make him see as happened in the working system of camera obscura. Later, pointing out Descartes’ geometry, cartesian system, axonometric projection, and perspective projection accordingly the positioning of sticks. In the end, my purpose was to correlate the entire discussion to the brain. This is a process of seeing with the mind.
Descartes, R. (2001). Discourse on
Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology. (P. J. Olscamp, Çev.) Hackett
S. (2012). The ‘eye of the mind’ and the ‘eye of the body’: Descartes and
Leibniz on truth, mathematics, and visuality. In: Barth F.G.,
Giampieri-Deutsch P., Klein HD. (eds) Sensory Perception. Vienna.
T. (1998). Representing Illusions: space, narrative and the spectator. PhD,
Chelsea College of Art & Design.
M. (2016). Seeing with the Hands: Blindness, Vision and Touch After
Descartes. Edinburgh University Press.
M. (tarih yok). Phenomenology of Perception.
K. E. (2011). Blindness and Enlightenment: An Essay: With a new
translation of Diderot’s ‘Letter on the Blind’ and La Mothe Le Vayer’s ‘Of a
Man Born Blind’. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
C. (1993). Descartes’ theory of visual spatial. Southern Illinois University;
The nearby environment in terms of same scales projects as references.
To determine a program, we, as a group, decided to compare the case studies worked on them by our classmates, and asked for the 3D modelings, and benefited from them. We looked at the buildings’ sites, found out how many square meters they occupy and the ratio of program spaces they included. And, in order to grasp the functions and programs distributed surrounding the site, we made use of the land use map.
There is the slum area around together with 4-5 storey buildings and the other buildings which have 15+ storeys. In this scala, we thought that the program should include a residential area. Plus, as far as we observed the surrounding needs local marketing, we suggested a local commercial area working together with offices, and social-sport facilities inside. Lastly, an adequate parking lot for all of these. This was a very general program proposal, it will have details following the project process.
The critics we got on our program proposal was efficient enough that many things occurred in my mind considering the future of the project!
Last weekend, I could make time to go to Istanbul and to visit 4th Istanbul design biennial a school of schools, thankfully. I placed here some of the projects that take my interest much correlating this semester’s theme. Surely, there were some other works, that I interested in, in other “schools” as well, below I will be mentioning some.
“Micro dwelling is a system for making low-cost homes of variable sizes for any number of persons. An open-source system that does not require an architect to execute it, the housing modules can ve made from a variety of materials, and moved to form different configurations on land, on water and underwater. The dwellings are not intended to define a social constellation, but to provide the basic equipment for creating one’s own social setting, through one’s own skills, for one’s own survival.”
The text above is cited from the exhibition caption.
And, then there was the Haliç project. / Arter x Earth School
This is the project that takes my interest a lot! If you could not be able to visit it, sorry for your miss.